Global
EN
Applications
Support
Support
With over a thousand cooperative customers and 17 years of service experience, we can provide you with everything from model selection to technical support
Development
Development
Our unyielding mission is to continuously innovate and lead the industry's progress.
News & Events
News & Events
We will share every little bit of our life with you at all times
About
About
Yinte Electronics integrates technology research and development, chip manufacturing, packaging and testing, sales, and service
Careers
Careers
Unleash potential together, shape a healthy future for humanity
Support
With over a thousand cooperative customers and 17 years of service experience, we can provide you with everything from model selection to technical support

What percentage should the deviation of inductance values among the three phases of a three-phase common-mode inductor be controlled within?

Time:2025-12-30 Views:16次
Share:

The typical requirement is ≤±5%, with the following reasons: Balanced current distribution: Excessive inductance deviation in a three-phase system can lead to neutral point offset, resulting in circulating currents or uneven EMI suppression. Standard basis: Industrial power supplies or motor drive applications (such as photovoltaic inverters) typically require a deviation of ±3% to 5% to ensure symmetrical filtering performance. Implementation method: Adopt high-precision winding technology (synchronous winding of three windings) and consistent magnetic core materials. Before leaving the factory, inductance is measured phase by phase and sorted and paired using automated equipment. Risk warning: Deviations exceeding 10% may lead to failure of zero-sequence current suppression or residual differential mode interference

Popular FAQs
ESD Protection for Position Sensors in Humanoid Robots
2026-01-23
Learn how to design ESD protection for position sensors in humanoid robots, ensuring signal integrity and reliability ag
When using common mode inductance in conjunction with differential mode inductance, how should the parameters of the two be matched?
2025-12-30
Common mode inductance suppresses common mode interference (symmetric interference between two wires to ground), while differential mode inductance suppresses differential mode interference (asymmetric interference between two wires). Parameter matching requires complementary frequency coverage: the effective suppression frequency band of common mode inductance (such as 1kHz-100MHz) and the differential mode inductance (such as 50Hz-10MHz) should overlap smoothly to avoid suppression blind spots. Generally, the resonant frequency of differential mode inductance is slightly higher than that of common mode inductance, covering low-frequency differential mode interference (such as power supply ripple). Impedance matching: the common mode impedance of common mode inductance should be much larger than the common mode impedance of the circuit (such as ≥10 times), and the differential mode impedance of differential mode inductance should be much larger than the differential mode impedance of the circuit to ensure effective attenuation of interference. Current compatibility: the rated current of differential mode inductance should match the operating current of the circuit (to avoid saturation), and the rated current of common mode inductance should consider the superposition of common mode current and differential mode current, with both requiring a 20%-50% margin. Core saturation characteristics: differential mode inductance should use a core with high saturation flux density (such as Sendust) to avoid saturation caused by high differential mode current; common mode inductance should use a core with high magnetic permeability (such as ferrite) to prioritize common mode suppression capability
When using multiple common mode inductors in series, how can we avoid the overlap of resonance points?
2025-12-30
The resonance of common-mode inductance is determined by its inductance (L) and parasitic capacitance (C, such as inter-winding capacitance), with the resonance frequency f0​=1/(2πLC​). When multiple stages are connected in series, if the resonance points are close, it can lead to a sharp decrease or even amplification of interference suppression in a certain frequency band. To avoid the overlap of resonance points, differentiated design methods are employed: by adjusting the parameters of each inductance (such as core material, number of turns, winding structure), the resonance points of each stage are staggered. For example, the front stage uses a high permeability core (such as manganese-zinc ferrite) to increase inductance and reduce resonance frequency; the rear stage uses a low permeability core (such as nickel-zinc ferrite) to decrease inductance and increase resonance frequency, ensuring that the resonance point spacing is ≥2 octaves. Introducing damping: connecting small resistors (such as 10-100Ω) between stages to consume resonance energy and suppress resonance peaks, without significantly affecting the common-mode impedance. Parasitic capacitance control: the rear stage inductance adopts layered winding or adds a shielding layer to reduce parasitic capacitance, shifting the resonance frequency to a higher frequency band and complementing the front stage